翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Schooner Peggy
・ United States v. Schooner Sally
・ United States v. Schwimmer
・ United States v. Screws
・ United States v. Seale
・ United States v. Seeger
・ United States v. Segui
・ United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.
・ United States v. Shabani
・ United States v. Shi
・ United States v. Shipp
・ United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians
・ United States v. Shynkarenko
・ United States v. Simms
・ United States v. Singer Mfg. Co.
United States v. Johns
・ United States v. Johnson
・ United States v. Johnson (1863)
・ United States v. Johnson (1899)
・ United States v. Johnson (1911)
・ United States v. Johnson (1944)
・ United States v. Johnson (1946)
・ United States v. Johnson (1966)
・ United States v. Johnson (1968)
・ United States v. Johnson (1982)
・ United States v. Johnson (1987)
・ United States v. Johnson (2000)
・ United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302 (1943)
・ United States v. Jones (2012)
・ United States v. Jones (disambiguation)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Johns : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Johns

''United States v. Johns'', was a United States Supreme Court criminal law case holding that a three-day delay in searching a motor vehicle under government control did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
==Background==
''Johns'' involved a United States Customs drug smuggling investigation in Arizona where Customs officers followed two pickup trucks to a remote desert airstrip, and set up surveillance. Two small airplanes landed and departed. The officers walked up on the trucks and could smell marijuana. In the back of the trucks were what obviously were bales of marijuana wrapped in dark green plastic bags and sealed with tape. Several men were arrested at the scene. Johns and another were the pilots, and they were arrested when they landed. The trucks were not searched at the scene. Instead, they were removed to a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) warehouse in Tucson. Three days later, the officers took samples of the marijuana.

The district court ordered suppression of the evidence because of the unreasonableness of the delay, and the government appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that the search of the vehicles three days later was unreasonable under ''United States v. Ross''.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Johns」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.